The significance of James Castle

In J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, there is nothing that depresses Holden Caulfield more than phony people. Throughout the novel we see him despising people that do things for show while admiring people that do things for themselves. We see this distinctly in the story of James Castle.
James Castle was Holden’s roommate at Elkton Hills. A “skinny little weak looking guy, with wrists the size of pencils”, James once called a conceited boy named Stabile conceited. Stabile and his friends went to James room and tried to make him take back what he said, but he wouldn’t, so they do something horrible to him (which Holden chooses not to tell the reader). “Instead of taking back what he said”, James commits suicide. We learn the story about James when Phoebe asks Holden what he likes. When I first read this I was startled; James’s story is traumatic, so for him to be one of the first thing to come to Holden’s mind is alarming. But knowing his ideals and how he reacts to phonies, Holden’s liking of James makes more sense.
The story of Holden getting beat up by Maurice mirrors James’s situation perfectly. Holden stands his ground that he does not have to pay Maurice the five dollars, and as a result, he gets beat up badly. Holden would rather get hurt than admit to a “phony” that was he did was wrong, which is the same thing that James did. Rather than admitting to Stabile he chose suicide. Holden appreciating James’s actions tells us that Holden would rather die than submit to “phonies”. He would rather die for a small cause than holdout for a larger one.
Although his liking of James makes sense, learning about Holden’s ideals I think made me more alarmed. I don’t see any benefits to standing your ground to someone when you have the chance of being hurt. The idea to me doesn’t make any sense; why would someone risk so much just for the satisfaction of being right? But Holden believes this from the very start of the novel, which I'm still unsure why.

Comments

  1. I agree. I think part of the reason that Holden really likes James and chooses to stand his ground even when it means getting hurt is because he (like Stephen) likes to think of himself as a martyr figure who would gladly sacrifice himself rather than submit to phonyness

    ReplyDelete
  2. I totally agree with your reading here. I understood why Holden liked him, and how they related, but it made me very worried for Holden. If he would rather die than submit to something "phony" I don't think he will die of old age. This presents a problem with Holden ever being able to live side by side with society as he would rather die than be part of it. Well written.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Totally. Holden is so into this idea of being a martyr. He talks about Jesus and James and makes Maurice steal from him. He doesn't care what happens to him as long as he stands his ground (even for foolish reasons.) I can understand being stubborn to the point of hurting yourself. I remember when Mr. Bicknell made me run even though I was sick, so I kept running even as I was throwing up, just to make a point. (But I feel like his fight with Stradlater doesn't really have much to do with being a martyr, so there's something larger at play in his habit of getting into fights).

    I too am alarmed by the romanticizing a character who killed himself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your qualms about Holden's martyr complex here are echoed by Mr. Antolini, in the quote he writes down for Holden about the difference between "dying nobly for a cause" and "living humbly for one." In this formulation, Holden's admiration for dying nobly is cast as the "mark of an immature man."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment